Succession law explained
GFR v SRP [2023] TASSC 15 concerns the estate of HMW (the deceased), who died intestate on 4 September 2021. The central issue is whether SRP, the mother of the deceased’s child and HMW’s former cohabitant, was his spouse under the Intestacy Act 2010 at the time of his death, entitling SRP to HMW’s entire …
Continue reading "Significant Relationship on Intestacy"
In Australia, the Forfeiture Rule prevents a person who has unlawfully killed another person from inheriting from the victim’s estate or obtaining another financial benefit from the death, such as an insurance payment or proceeds from writing a memoir about the crime. The forfeiture rule originated in the English Court of Appeal case of Cleaver v Mutual Reserve …
Pauline Tyson (”the deceased”) died on December 11, 2003, shortly after finalising her last Will. In this Will, the deceased named her brother Howard ( “the executor”) as the executor and trustee of her estate. The deceased bequeathed $65,000, the furnishings from her home and all her other personal belongings to her daughter, Wendy. Additionally, …
Erem v Moussa [2024] NSWSC 641 (Richmond J) involved testamentary capacity, the mental ability to sever a joint tenancy, proprietary estoppel, resulting trust, Will rectification, and alternatively, a family provision order. The matters concerned the estate of Mary Moussa (the deceased), who lived with Ali Erem (the plaintiff) from 1990 until she died in 2015. …
In Phillips v The State Coroner & Anor [2024] SASC 134, the applicant is the mother of the deceased Scot Adam Phillips, whose body is currently in the coroner's custody. The second respondent is the deceased's twin sister. The matter concerns the funeral arrangements for the deceased and whether the deceased should be buried or …
In Kramer v Stone [2024] HCA 48, the High Court dismissed an appeal from Kramer v Stone [2023] NSWCA 270; 112 NSWLR 564 concerning the criteria for establishing liability under "proprietary estoppel by encouragement," an equitable remedy based on an expectation of future property ownership induced by representations that the respondent relied upon to their …
Continue reading "High Court of Australia Proprietary estoppel by encouragement"
A cost agreement can be highly beneficial for several reasons. First, it serves as prima facie evidence that a practitioner has provided adequate cost disclosure and that the costs are fair and reasonable, as outlined in s 172, particularly s172 (4) of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (LPUL). Additionally, it ensures that a client's contractual …
Continue reading "Successful Outcome & the Conditional Cost Agreement"
In Atchison v Holloway & Anor; Holloway & Anor v Atchison [2024] NSWSC 1523, Two sets of legal proceedings are currently before the Court. The first involves a claim by Noelene Joan Holloway (Defendant in Possession Proceedings; Plaintiff in Family Provision Proceedings) against Lorraine Ann Atchison and Jennifer Ada Richards, the executors of the estate …
Continue reading "Possession, Provision, & the Deceased Estate"
Disclaimer of Gifts or Entitlements Beneficiaries are not obligated to accept a gift under a will or an entitlement arising from intestacy. A beneficiary may disclaim a gift or entitlement, which can be made verbally, in writing, or through conduct. Jemal David Zagami (as administrator of the deceased’s estate) v James [2017] WASC 292 Jean …
Continue reading "Disclaimer of Interest and Administration of Estate"
Freezing orders, often referred to as asset preservation or Mareva orders, are issued by the Supreme Court to safeguard an individual’s assets. A freezing order prevents the hiding, transferring, or spending of assets believed to have been obtained unlawfully (directly or indirectly). The Mareva injunction is an equitable remedy that originated from Denning LJ’s interpretation …