In The Estate of Shoushani; Shoushani v Tadros [2025] NSWSC 1335, the Court illustrated its readiness to intervene when estate administrators misuse their position. It steps in to correct the misapplication of estate funds. Slattery J of the Supreme Court of New South Wales addressed serious maladministration by an estate administrator. Background After the death …
Crown v Holt [No 2] [2025] WASC 522; Crown v Holt [2024] WASC 332 Executor Guilty of Contempt
When the executor fails to administer the estate. Civil Contempt In AMIEU v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98;[1986] HCA 4, the High Court (Gibbs CJ, Mason, Wilson and Deane JJ) commented on the development of a distinction between civil and criminal contempt (at 106): “The distinction, not recognised in Scotland, which has …
Testamentary Capacity & the Undutiful Will
MCINERNEY v D'ORTENZIO (FORMERLY O'DEA) & ORS [2026] SASCA 7 James Vincent McInerney (the first respondent) applied for probate of the 25 January 2019 Will. Alternatively, he applied for the 26 December 2018 Will. The second respondent is the Catholic Church Endowment Society Incorporated. The third respondent is Dr Harold Lane. They contended that the …
Continue reading "Testamentary Capacity & the Undutiful Will"
The Impact of Intestacy on Liam Payne’s £28.6 Million Estate
Liam Payne: Intestacy and Estate Administration Liam Payne died in October 2024 at age 31 without a valid Will. His estate is affected by the UK intestacy rules. These are primarily set out in the Administration of Estates Act 1925. Related statutes also play a role. These rules govern the administration and distribution of an …
Continue reading "The Impact of Intestacy on Liam Payne’s £28.6 Million Estate"
Ross v Gordon [2026] ACTCA 1 Family Provision & Anshun Estoppel
Anshun estoppel prevents parties from raising claims or defences in later proceedings. This happens if those matters were so closely connected to earlier litigation. It was unreasonable not to raise them at that time. The doctrine aims to guarantee finality and avoid piecemeal litigation. The High Court established this principle in Port of Melbourne Authority …
Continue reading "Ross v Gordon [2026] ACTCA 1 Family Provision & Anshun Estoppel"
Understanding Cost Capping in Family Provision Cases
Lord v Craig [2026] NSWSC 17 looks at whether proportionality can prevent legal costs from using up an estate. Justice Meek said the court must balance competing interests based on the facts. In inheritance disputes, this means weighing all relevant factors. The court should also keep in mind that emotions can sometimes outweigh the estate’s …
Continue reading "Understanding Cost Capping in Family Provision Cases"
Access to restricted documents concerning settlement under Order 70 Rule 10 of the Supreme Court Rules 1971 (WA)
In Western Australia, a “next friend” is the mechanism the Supreme Court uses to ensure that people who cannot conduct litigation for themselves—such as children or adults lacking legal capacity—are adequately protected. Under Order 70 of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA), a next friend is authorised to commence and manage proceedings on …
Russell v Ceylan[2025] NSWSC 1044 & Cross-Border Succession Law
When an Australian client dies owning property in both Sydney and Paris, legal professionals must navigate two distinct legal systems. They do this to guarantee a fair settlement. Cross-border estates are increasingly common, as many Australians own property overseas or live abroad for extended periods. Nonetheless, when wills are executed in different countries, succession becomes …
Continue reading "Russell v Ceylan[2025] NSWSC 1044 & Cross-Border Succession Law"
Waters v Frank; Frank v Waters (No 2) [2025] NSWSC 1586 Costs,Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence
Waters v Frank; Frank v Waters [2025] NSWSC 1389 concerned a contested Will. It involved Dr Percy Waters (the deceased), a highly vulnerable and elderly man. His dependence on his carer, Lavinia Williment (the second defendant), intensified in the later years of his life. Over time, successive wills increasingly benefited the carer. This occurred at …
Extrinsic Evidence in Will Interpretation: Estate of Pendergast; Pendergast v Shingles [2025] NSWSC 909
Principles of Construction In Fell v Fell (1922) 31 CLR 268 at 273–4, Isaacs J articulated principles that have been applied consistently in Will construction: First, derive the meaning of a Will from the document itself. Use only the extrinsic evidence necessary to understand the language the testator used. Second, construe a Will according to …